x
LATEST ARTICLE Exploring Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement: a post-COP29 analysis Read Article

Tailoring REDD+ policies to forest transition stages: a new approach

Researchers from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) highlight that understanding a country's forest cover and its changes is crucial for designing effective REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) policies.

Tailoring REDD+ policies to forest transition stages a new approach_Drone picture of ‘forest–agricultural mosaics’ stage in Côte d’Ivoire_visual 1Drone picture of ‘forest–agricultural mosaics’ stage in Côte d’Ivoire, reforestation alongside agricultural activities. AI generated picture.

REDD+, a UN-backed initiative, aims to support nature restoration by incentivising the conservation, restoration, and sustainable management of forests. According to Arild Angelsen, a senior associate at CIFOR, effective REDD+ policies must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each country.

To provide clearer guidance, Angelsen and Tom Rudel, a professor at Rutgers University, have proposed a ‘forest transition approach’ in their paper published in the Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. This approach categorises forest conditions into three stages: core forests, frontiers, and forest–agricultural mosaics.

Read more: The future of carbon credits: a $100 billion market by 2035

In the ‘core forests’ stage, countries like Suriname and Gabon have high forest cover and low deforestation rates. Policies here should focus on maintaining this preservation by avoiding infrastructure projects that could accelerate deforestation.

The ‘frontiers’ stage, exemplified by Indonesia, is marked by accelerated deforestation. REDD+ policies should aim to reduce agricultural rent and stabilise forest cover, thereby shortening this stage.

Countries like El Salvador and Côte d’Ivoire, in the ‘forest–agricultural mosaics’ stage, experience reforestation alongside agricultural activities. Policies should promote tree planting, improved agricultural technologies, and environmental service payments.

Read more: What makes DGB’s reforestation projects unique?

Angelsen emphasises the need to avoid policies that inadvertently encourage deforestation, such as infrastructure projects and certain agricultural subsidies. Balancing development objectives with conservation can create win-win scenarios, addressing both environmental issues and development goals in up-and-coming countries.

At DGB Group, we are committed to pioneering nature-based solutions that not only capture carbon but also provide significant environmental and socio-economic benefits. Our initiatives generate premium, verified carbon units, aiding businesses in achieving their sustainability targets. Through a rigorous methodology, we aim to address global environmental challenges and scale nature-based solutions.

Discover our carbon units from our game-changing projects

Before you go...

As DGB Group, our sole purpose is to rebuild trust and serve the public by making the right information available to everyone. By subscribing to our mailing newsletter, you can get the latest tips and trends from DGB Group's expert team in your inbox. Sign up now and never miss the insights.

Read other news

CEEZER, a Berlin-based carbon credit platform, is making strides in enhancing transparency within th..

A recent analysis has revealed that TikTok's annual carbon emissions are likely higher than Greece's..

Isometric has announced partnerships with seven digital monitoring, reporting, and verification (dMR..

The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has detailed new eligibility criteria for carbo..

Let’s get to know you

Let's talk about how we can create value together for your sustainability journey.